Letter to the Southern Indiana Federal District Court

Sept. 28, 2015

Chief Judge Richard L. Young
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Clerks Office Room 105
46 East Ohio Street
Indianapolis, IN 46204

Dear Sir:

My name is Paul Aaron Guthrie. I am a legal analyst and political scientist, and have recently authored a book on the natural laws of political rights, specifically addressing the Article II presidential eligibility requirement to be a “natural born Citizen”.

Beginning in your District Court on January 14th, 2013, I filed two lawsuits against the United States and Obama, because Obama is not qualified as an Article II “natural born Citizen”, and this fundamentally changes the nature of our government. My cases and the resulting fraudulent decisions of the court are posted at my website http://www.jedipauly.com. I was illegally denied due process of law, just like hundreds of others throughout the nation over the years since the 2008/9 presidential election. I encountered criminal political activity in the form of religious opinions emanating from the judges Stinson and Barker, who used their own personal subjective opinions of the law, rather than the facts of the law, to unlawfully deny standing. I accuse these two of committing criminal fraud, criminal racketeering (depriving the legitimate Constitutional Republic for their income and profit), criminal obstruction of justice, unlawful denial of due process, and seditious conspiracy (18 USC § 2384) to foment rebellion in the elections for the purpose of overthrowing the United States Constitutional Republic, in order to maintain a Constitutionally unqualified Obama in the Office of President, for their personal political gain and profit. They have taken it upon themselves to eviscerate the rule of law, stripping us all of our voting rights, right to a representative government, of our right to self-determination, and are subjecting us all to taxation without representation, the very essence of slavery, because the Congress does not represent the natural born Citizens since 2008/9, and they have enslaved us all under lawless tyranny.

When Obama came to power illegally, all of the federal judges and military personnel had a legal fiduciary duty to resign their offices and commissions and make this crime known. You have all failed to do your duty, have abandoned your oaths and duty to the Constitution, and now you are all engaged in the systematic denial of the rule of law and the denial of due process of law. You are all engaged in criminal political activity from the judge’s bench in maintaining a religio-monarchic form of government, in violation of the Constitution and against the People. This is due to the fact that you all will not recognize and enforce the “Law” jurisdiction of Article III, Section 2, which is referring to the Natural Law and violations of the natural order rights.

It is in the “Law” jurisdiction where what is a Crime, Liberty, Justice, and “natural born Citizen” are defined, as well as how marriage is defined only between a man and woman as a public political right. The definition and meaning of the term “natural born Citizen” is not invented nor decreed by mankind. Just like the definition of marriage as being between a man and woman is not invented by mankind, but simply discovered as a natural order rule. Man just uses reason and science to discover the rules of the natural order which define what a Crime is, or what a “natural born Citizen” is, and which define that this latter is an inherited natural right, not a bestowed ‘legal right’ of Positive Law. Equity Law, Admiralty Law, and Maritime Law are all Positive Law, and together they are merely one-half of the legal system, as the opposing other half is the Natural Law, as codified in Article III, Section 2, as the “Law” jurisdiction. The “Law” jurisdiction concerns violations of the Laws of Nature, the source of the criminal code. The court is bound to recognize and protect these natural rights, but none of you seem to understand this. The jurisdiction of the courts is declared to be both criminal and civil cases, “Law and Equity”, and it is in the “Law” jurisdiction wherein natural rights and “natural born Citizen” are objectively and scientifically defined.

As natural born Citizens, we are not duty-bound to recognize the legitimacy of Obama, or the legitimacy and immunity of the courts and judges as long as a non-natural born Citizen occupies the Office of President. You are currently not legitimate Article III judges of the Republic under any rule of law at all, not engaged in the legitimate activities of legitimate judges. Whether you are cognizant of it or not, you are all using your offices to commit fraud and to commit crimes, which are the systematic denial of due process and the enslavement of natural born Citizens under a religious tyranny government, because it is only a subjective religious opinion that Obama is a ‘President’, not a scientific fact of Nature (Natural Law) or U.S. law (Positive Law).

False judge Barker claimed that I “failed to convince” her of the definition and meaning of Article II “natural born Citizen” as her basis to dismiss my suit. Her testimony, recorded in the public record for all to see, is criminal fraud. I am not supposed to even be in a position to have to convince her of the definition and meaning in order to gain standing against an obviously false President, as it has been a settled matter of law for over 200 years, and it is her duty to already know the obvious definition and meaning in order to even take the judge’s oath and do her job to uphold and defend the Constitution and the rule of law. It is not her place to interject her own subjective and false religious opinion belief of the definition and meaning of this natural scientific principle in order to shield herself and Obama, and thereby unlawfully dismiss my case and deny natural born Citizens standing in court. Barker in particular is a mother, and she is supposed to be educated in the science of Jurisprudence, but yet she obviously does not comprehend the term “natural born”. She does not realize that because only females give birth to offspring and therefore only females can rely upon witness testimony at the time of birth in order to prove the parentage, that males cannot and this necessitates that male fathers have to claim and report their offspring in order to secure the natural political rights in the father’s society. Her testimony and her ignorance of the law are not believable.

For your information, the term “natural born Citizen” consists of an adjective phrase, “natural born”, modifying a proper noun title, “Citizen”. The proper noun “Citizen” means ‘Citizen of the United States’ from a State of the Union; which is a title, hence the capitalization, because titles are capitalized in the English language. In the civil law, “natural”, which is just shorthand for “natural born”, simply means the legal opposite of ‘adopted’, as in the sentence, “Are those your natural born children (natural children), or are they adopted?”

Anyone can look up the definition of ‘natural children’ in most any law dictionary and it will confirm that “natural”, i.e., “natural born” just means the legal opposite of ‘adopted’. I prefer the Bouvier Law Dictionary of 1856, 6th rev. edition, accessible online at http://www.constitution.org/bouv/bouvier.htm, but just about any law dictionary should say the same thing. Therefore, it should be blindingly obvious that “natural born Citizen” simply means NOT the adopted citizen (i.e., not the ‘naturalized citizen’, which is what Obama is by scientific definition of law).

But, who are the ‘adopted’ citizens (the ‘naturalized citizens’), and who are the “natural born”? It is very simple to figure out. The adopted citizens are the offspring of non-citizen fathers, eligible for naturalization by being either born under the territorial jurisdiction of the United States (14th Amendment), i.e., in a State or federal territory or possession (jus soli), or born to a citizen mother (jus sanguinis). These are natural born SUBJECTS of federal jurisdiction, the legal opposite of a “natural born Citizen”. The non-adopted or natural members are just the offspring of citizen fathers who come from a State of the Union. It is very simple and obvious. Any layman can discover and see the truth of the matter. Thus Obama is not qualified under the Constitution and is a fake false President, by legal definition actually an Emperor-God-King, which all are forced to worship, and by his installation the Republic has been overthrown.

The offspring of U.S. citizen fathers who come from a State of the Union are not born as federal jurisdiction subjects at birth for citizenship purposes. They are simply born under the jurisdiction of the citizen father who must legitimate his offspring within 18 years of the birth in order to secure the natural right of citizenship. This is codified in 8 USC § 1409, which was examined and declared by the Supreme Court in the 2001 case Nguyen v. INS 533 U.S. 53 (2001). These are not born under federal jurisdiction as subjects, because the right to be a natural born Citizen is an inherited natural right which only comes from our U.S. citizen fathers, not a legal right that is bestowed, as verified by 8 USC § 1409 and by the Supreme Court in the Nguyen case. The reason that the definition of natural born Citizen is codified by 8 USC § 1409, the code for citizenship if only one parent is a U.S. citizen and the parents are not married, is because the act of marriage for the citizen father is a public political act which legitimizes the offspring of a citizen father before the child is even born, securing the natural right of citizenship. The offspring of U.S. citizen fathers from a State are recognized and declared to be Article II “natural born Citizens”, as long as the father is known, so that they do not have to be born under federal territory or statutory jurisdiction. Thus the place of birth and mother are both irrelevant to claim “natural born Citizen” status, as those are only avenues for alien offspring to be brought under subject status so that the naturalization process can apply to adopt the alien offspring by granting a ‘legal right’ of citizenship.

You can read more about these scientific principles of jurisprudence in my book Demonic Positivism versus the Science of “natural born Citizen”, of which I have included a free copy, so that you can have a more detailed explanation of the law governing nbC status, along with my detailed analysis of what Barker and Stinson have done.

I am writing to you about this because I would like to believe that not all the federal judges are criminally insane, willfully dishonoring their citizen fathers, and deliberately dishonoring their oaths to uphold and defend the Constitution and the rule of law. You are the Chief Judge, and I see it as your job to rein in these rogue elements and educate them. You also have a duty to report the obvious criminal political activity which has permitted the fraud Obama to strong-arm his way into the Office of President without any Constitutional authority.

Both Barker and Stinson are females who show no respect for the natural political rights of males. They are engaged in systematic denial of due process and standing against plaintiffs who sue fraud Obama. They discriminate against males based upon the sexual gender identity as males, because only males who are already citizens (not ‘subjects’) can by sex create a natural born Citizen. As a male, you should realize that this issue is one regarding the natural political rights of males to use the sex act to create another citizen, a “natural born”, i.e., non-adopted citizen, a “natural born Citizen”. Apparently Barker and Stinson think that females are hermaphrodites who impregnate themselves in a political vacuum, and the natural political rights which we male citizens pass on to our children are not included in the protections codified in the Constitution.

Again, more explanation of these scientific legal principles is in my enclosed book, which I was forced to write and publish in order to bring these serious crimes to light and to educate the mis-informed. If you want to get straight to the definition proof and meaning, see the analysis of Barker and Stinson’s criminal behavior, and learn what happened when I went to the FBI to report these crimes, then skip to Chapters 6, 7, 8, and 9.

Please be advised that copies of this letter are being sent to the FBI, Department of Justice, the Secret Service, the Department of Homeland Security, the Inspector General, to other State and federal judges, and to various news organizations. Not that any of that matters, as they have shown that they do not wish to do anything about it, as they are all brainwashed, in a conflict of interest, and refuse to do their jobs to enforce the Constitution and the rule of law in order to protect me and other natural born Citizens. Instead, they have just threatened me with arrest or murder. This is functional insanity, the inability to see the facts of reality and of scientific jurisprudence. Obviously, our society is being subjected to sustained massive coordinated criminal propaganda emanating from the news media, Congress, and the courts. This is all criminal political activity, and it is my duty and yours to report these very serious crimes which amount to High Treason and unlawful warfare against the Constitutional Republic and against natural born Citizens.

I hope that you are one who can understand this science of jurisprudence and have the honor to stand by your oath.

Paul A. Guthrie