The Lost Science of the Elohim


The Plot to Murder Obama, Donald Trump, and natural born Citizens

For almost 8 years now, I, Paul Guthrie (Jedi Pauly), have been telling the world that Obama is not a natural born Citizen.  During this entire time, I have been subjected to extreme violent religio-monarchic incitement of hatred and death threats against me and my family for my objective and scientific discovery of the true definition and meaning of Article II “natural born Citizen”, which proves that Obama is not a lawful or legitimate President, but is actually by legal definition an Emperor-God-King, a Black Hitler.  These violent religious extremist terrorism death threats and incited violent defamations against me and my family are emanating from Obama, the judges, attorneys, prosecutors, Congress, government employees, and news media.  Obama is a criminally insane religious extremist murderer who has personally threatened my life with execution.  He brags about killing American citizens without due process of law or trial, his favorite method of assassination being by drone attack against anyone whom he personally deems a threat to the security of his unlawful administration.  He has no lawful immunity at all because he is not a “natural born Citizen”, thus his extra-judicial execution of American citizens is nothing but the state approving an insane criminal psychopath usurper, who has overthrown the Constitutional Republic, to murder citizens of the United States.  All those Secret Service agents, FBI and CIA agents, Military persons, Congress persons, and judges who support Obama, and maintain him in power against the Constitution, are guilty as co-conspirators in these murders, and in the death threats and violent extremist religio-political terrorism against me and against natural born Citizens in general. 

On Friday, March 18, 2016, for the first time in U.S. history at the State level, the scientific objective proof of my allegations was entered into the court record in THE MADISON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURTS in Madison County, Indiana.  [See MOTION TO QUASH SUMMONS FOR JURY DUTY posted at .] 

On that same day, I carried several letters and copies of my book, Demonic Positivism versus the Science of “natural born Citizen”, to the judges of the Madison County Superior Courts, to five of the federal judges in the 7th Judicial Circuit Southern District in Indianapolis, to the U.S. Marshals Office with a forwarding to the FBI, and to the Secret Service, putting all of them on legal notice that they are all potential suspects as co-conspirators in a potential plot to murder Mr. Obama, Mr. Trump, and natural born Citizens, in order to prevent a bona fide natural born Citizen (Mr. Trump) from attaining the Office of President, so as to prevent government employees from being exposed as complicit seditious traitors to their country. [See the letters to the aforementioned list of persons posted at .] 

Then later that same day, I was visited at home by a Secret Service agent.  The Secret Service seemed predisposed to consider me a person with mental health issues, and predisposed to paint me as a racist, since a great many of the questions in that initial visit were for evaluating that.  In reality, it is the Secret Service and the rest of the government employees who are the criminally insane racists, because the only reason they support Obama in power and call him “President” is because he is Black, not because he is a “natural born Citizen” as required under the Constitution in Article II.  Thus the Secret Service, by maintaining a non-natural born Citizen in the Office of President against the Constitution based upon the color of his skin, are the ones inciting Black-on-White hatred and are inciting violence against natural born Citizens, perpetrated via false front agitator groups such as,, and, funded by George Soros to destabilize the nation.  This situation has set up Mr. Obama to be assassinated by those criminal elements that are behind his unlawful maintenance in Office, for the reason of shutting Obama’s mouth so that he cannot finger his co-conspirators. 

Also, at the same time that the Secret Service is maintaining an unlawful usurper in the Office, an act of civil war against the American people, they are supposedly also ‘protecting’ Mr. Trump in his bid to take back our country and restore the Constitutional Republic –which has been overthrown with the Secret Service’s complicity.  Thus the Secret Service is at a duplicitous war with itself, with the Constitution, with the rule of law, and with the American people.  The Secret Service has been set up, by George Soros, and by the Democratic and Republican Parties which are currently acting as violent religious extremist hate groups, to be the ones to take the blame for the incitement of hatred against, and the murder of, Mr. Trump, for the purpose of preventing a bona fide natural born Citizen from attaining the Office of President, as that would expose all of these criminal actors for their crimes of High Treason.  Thus it is now exposed that it is the Congress and the Democrat and Republican parties, using the Secret Service, who are the racist haters of Whitey and of natural born Citizens, and who are the ones engaged in inciting hate groups to commit violence at the political rallies of Mr. Trump and set him up to be murdered in order to prevent him from lawfully exercising his political right in the United States to become the next President. 

I gave the Secret Service the MOTION which proves my allegations, and I gave them a letter that I had sent to Mr. Trump’s campaign managers.  [See letter to Mr. Trump posted at .]  These two documents explain the entire situation and are conclusive scientific objective proof of my claims.  Now the government knows the truth.  What are they going to do about it?  Are they going to deny it and continue to commit more crimes, and try to cover this up, indicting themselves and digging themselves in deeper, like they have been doing for the last 8 years whenever I have come forward with the truth?  Or are they going to now get themselves under the Constitution in order to obtain proper governmental immunity, and do their jobs to arrest Obama and those responsible for these horrendous crimes? 

We are in a declared war, but the Secret Service, DoJ, FBI, Marshals Office, Congress, Judges, Prosecutors, Military, News Media, etc., apparently do not comprehend the nature of the war that we are in.  The war is a war of science and law versus violent religious extremist political ideology.  These actors mentioned do not realize that THEY are the ones who have been brainwashed into being the violent religious extremists waging warfare upon the Constitutional Republic and upon natural born Citizens, due to their violent religious opinion that Obama is a “President”, which is a lie of Biblical proportions.  This violent religious indoctrination of the U.S. government employee takes the form of injecting the false meme into the minds of everyone via the two false words “President Obama” being broadcast over and over again in the popular press as fascist brainwashing and cult indoctrination.  That is the violent lie injected into the subconscious mind of government employees and into the minds of the public, which is the basis of the fascist mind control causing the government employee to act violently against the rights of natural born Citizens, with extreme religious prejudice and bigotry towards innocent natural born Citizens complaining that Obama is not a lawful or legitimate President because he is not a natural born Citizen, which is a scientific position, not a religious opinion. 

The Secret Service wanted to know if I am a physical threat to Obama.  I am not the physical threat.  I wanted to tell them that the only threat I represent is that of science and the rule of law, which is a threat to any criminal or violent religious terrorist.  The pen is mightier than the sword, and civilized men of peace duke out their battles in the court room with science, reason, and law, not with guns and bullets.  The United States government obviously thinks that one has to fight religion with bombs and bullets.  Bombs and bullets are not even the right weapon to use against violent religious extremist political ideology, and when used, will only breed more violent religious extremism backlash.  But the government employees appear to be imbeciles who do not realize these facts of life.  They do not realize that you must fight violent religious extremism with SCIENCE and EDUCATION to cure the disease of ignorance.  That is what my MOTION TO QUASH SUMMONS FOR JURY DUTY does, and my science book Demonic Positivism versus the Science of “natural born Citizen” does, for those who are intelligent enough to read the words and comprehend the science. 

The federal government and the U.S. military are not actually fighting against radical violent religious political ideology.  Instead, they are fighting against the Constitution and against natural born Citizens, to enslave them under violent religio-monarchic political ideology.  The proof is very simple and obvious to see.  By declaring and maintaining that Obama is a “natural born Citizen”, which is a false religious point of view, the Military (DoD), Congress, DoJ, FBI, and attorney judges have taken it upon themselves to redefine natural born Citizen to mean an offspring of a non-citizen father who is born to a U.S. citizen mother.  Therefore, this illegal and unlawful re-definition, contrary to the proper definition and meaning of natural born Citizen as being the offspring of a U.S. citizen father from a State of the Union, now permits any male ISIS Muslim terrorist to assemble a harem of U.S. citizen females to impregnate in order that the offspring can be born in a Muslim country (or even in the U.S.) to a Muslim terrorist non-U.S. citizen father and a U.S. citizen mother, and claim to be an Article II “natural born Citizen” and be allowed to become U.S. President!  Now we see one of the real reasons why Obama has been installed and maintained as a fraudulent ‘President’.  It is so the immigration and naturalization routes can be opened up to permit Muslim radical religious extremists into the country as false natural born Citizens, so that they can take over the Office of President and throw down the Constitutional Republic, and erect a caliphate dictatorship in its place, which has actually already happened with Obama.  Way to go, government employees!  Such a good job you’ve (not) done protecting America from radical Islam and protecting the nation’s scientists from violent religio-monarchic terrorist persecution.  Now we can all see who the real terrorists are, and it is the government employees in every branch of government and in the DoD. 

Now you had all better hope and pray that Mr. Cruz or some other non-natural born Citizen does not get into Office, because especially after all this notice of the facts, you will all be implicated, indicted, and prosecuted for your complicit role in a seditious conspiracy to foment rebellion and insurrection via Presidential elections for the purpose of overthrowing the United States Constitutional Republic, for the preservation of your own self-interested job status and financial gain.  If you have not acted and continue to ignore these facts, then you will have no immunity and I will not be able to help you defend yourself from going to prison or being executed for High Treason.  It is urgent that right now you must have a scientific epiphany and join with the natural born Citizens in a lawful rebellion against this illegal and unlawful imperial rule, if you all want to stay out of prison.  Do not get mad at me, as I am not to blame.  I am merely the messenger; and your potential savior if you now change your behavior to act in the interest of your nation.  This crisis you are having now is because Congress failed to have a crisis when the elections in 2008/9 failed to produce a valid candidate for the Office, which they just criminally swept under the rug, even after I put them and the courts on notice of the crisis on January 14, 2013.  Because they did not follow the Constitution and law, now the crisis has fallen upon the Executive and Judicial branches.  You all have no one to blame but Congress and yourselves, as you have all been failures as citizens in your duty to know what a natural born Citizen is.  Your own failure as a citizen, to understand the basics of civics and the basis of a republic, has brought this crisis upon you.

Paul A. Guthrie

Physical Scientist (Applied Physics and Mathematics), Political Scientist, Legal and Political Analyst, Expert Scholar of Natural Law and the U.S. Constitution, Author


What you will discover in the book Demonic Positivism versus the Science of “natural born Citizen”

In Demonic Positivism versus the Science of “natural born Citizen” you will discover:

What the pre-existent basis of Law is:  Why one cannot understand Law or the Constitution without understanding that the basis is the Natural Law, the Laws of Nature.  Discovery of the Laws of Nature is Science, and a Just legal system must be based upon man’s Positive Law acknowledging and protecting the Natural Law rights.

The difference between the legal definition of a King and the legal definition of a President.

The correct real definition of “natural born Citizen”, the claimed offspring of a U.S. citizen father, shows that Obama is not one.  It can be simply understood by examining who inherits citizenship and who must be naturalized.

And that this fundamental issue matters, because to have an occupant of the presidency who has not inherited the natural right of membership in the political society from his or her father is by legal definition to have a Monarchy again.

The principle at the basis of the real definition of “natural born Citizen”, the inheritance of political rights from our fathers, shows that the Gay Marriage Agenda is for engineering the downfall of the Rule of Law.

How I was repeatedly ejected from my sales venues for having private conversations about the illegitimacy of Obama.  How I lost my business because it was no longer safe for me to encounter the ignorant, who use threat of force and arrest, to silence anyone who disagrees with the prevalent baseless opinion that Obama was/is a President.

How I went to Federal Court, twice, to expose that my rights as a natural born Citizen of a Republic have been stripped from me.  I encountered only criminal political activity from the judges who substituted their own opinion in order to dismiss charges against Obama and against the judiciary itself.  They provided ample evidence of their own criminal misconduct in their own Judgement statements.

How I went to England to claim asylum in order to alert the world to the illegitimacy of the American government.  The barristers completely agreed with me, agreed with the correct definition of “natural born Citizen”, and agreed that Obama is not one, but their bosses had another political agenda that betrayed their former treaties to protect the U.S. Republic.

The real message of Jesus, that was hidden and reinterpreted because it threatened monarchs, both kings and popes.  Jesus was an entirely human philosopher who understood the Natural Law to be the basis of Justice and of the Just Rule of Law.

How Jesus exposed the illegitimacy of the Roman Empire that was no longer a Republic because it had eliminated the basis of Justice of the Natural Law, and Jesus exposed the illegitimate tax and money systems which were violently unjustly imposed as a tool of Empire.

How the Founding Fathers understood that opinions must not be allowed to rule the law, and that a Just Rule of Law could only be created by having the basis of the law in the objective scientific reality of Natural Law.

How the divorcing of opinions from the legal system, i.e., the Separation of Church and State, created a Republic instead of a Monarchy.

How, by legal definition, the U.S. Republic has now been overthrown to be ruled by baseless religio-monarchic opinions instead of Law, and therefore has become a monarchy empire once again.

Website with bookstore link:

Letter to the Southern Indiana Federal District Court

Sept. 28, 2015

Chief Judge Richard L. Young
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Clerks Office Room 105
46 East Ohio Street
Indianapolis, IN 46204

Dear Sir:

My name is Paul Aaron Guthrie. I am a legal analyst and political scientist, and have recently authored a book on the natural laws of political rights, specifically addressing the Article II presidential eligibility requirement to be a “natural born Citizen”.

Beginning in your District Court on January 14th, 2013, I filed two lawsuits against the United States and Obama, because Obama is not qualified as an Article II “natural born Citizen”, and this fundamentally changes the nature of our government. My cases and the resulting fraudulent decisions of the court are posted at my website I was illegally denied due process of law, just like hundreds of others throughout the nation over the years since the 2008/9 presidential election. I encountered criminal political activity in the form of religious opinions emanating from the judges Stinson and Barker, who used their own personal subjective opinions of the law, rather than the facts of the law, to unlawfully deny standing. I accuse these two of committing criminal fraud, criminal racketeering (depriving the legitimate Constitutional Republic for their income and profit), criminal obstruction of justice, unlawful denial of due process, and seditious conspiracy (18 USC § 2384) to foment rebellion in the elections for the purpose of overthrowing the United States Constitutional Republic, in order to maintain a Constitutionally unqualified Obama in the Office of President, for their personal political gain and profit. They have taken it upon themselves to eviscerate the rule of law, stripping us all of our voting rights, right to a representative government, of our right to self-determination, and are subjecting us all to taxation without representation, the very essence of slavery, because the Congress does not represent the natural born Citizens since 2008/9, and they have enslaved us all under lawless tyranny.

When Obama came to power illegally, all of the federal judges and military personnel had a legal fiduciary duty to resign their offices and commissions and make this crime known. You have all failed to do your duty, have abandoned your oaths and duty to the Constitution, and now you are all engaged in the systematic denial of the rule of law and the denial of due process of law. You are all engaged in criminal political activity from the judge’s bench in maintaining a religio-monarchic form of government, in violation of the Constitution and against the People. This is due to the fact that you all will not recognize and enforce the “Law” jurisdiction of Article III, Section 2, which is referring to the Natural Law and violations of the natural order rights.

It is in the “Law” jurisdiction where what is a Crime, Liberty, Justice, and “natural born Citizen” are defined, as well as how marriage is defined only between a man and woman as a public political right. The definition and meaning of the term “natural born Citizen” is not invented nor decreed by mankind. Just like the definition of marriage as being between a man and woman is not invented by mankind, but simply discovered as a natural order rule. Man just uses reason and science to discover the rules of the natural order which define what a Crime is, or what a “natural born Citizen” is, and which define that this latter is an inherited natural right, not a bestowed ‘legal right’ of Positive Law. Equity Law, Admiralty Law, and Maritime Law are all Positive Law, and together they are merely one-half of the legal system, as the opposing other half is the Natural Law, as codified in Article III, Section 2, as the “Law” jurisdiction. The “Law” jurisdiction concerns violations of the Laws of Nature, the source of the criminal code. The court is bound to recognize and protect these natural rights, but none of you seem to understand this. The jurisdiction of the courts is declared to be both criminal and civil cases, “Law and Equity”, and it is in the “Law” jurisdiction wherein natural rights and “natural born Citizen” are objectively and scientifically defined.

As natural born Citizens, we are not duty-bound to recognize the legitimacy of Obama, or the legitimacy and immunity of the courts and judges as long as a non-natural born Citizen occupies the Office of President. You are currently not legitimate Article III judges of the Republic under any rule of law at all, not engaged in the legitimate activities of legitimate judges. Whether you are cognizant of it or not, you are all using your offices to commit fraud and to commit crimes, which are the systematic denial of due process and the enslavement of natural born Citizens under a religious tyranny government, because it is only a subjective religious opinion that Obama is a ‘President’, not a scientific fact of Nature (Natural Law) or U.S. law (Positive Law).

False judge Barker claimed that I “failed to convince” her of the definition and meaning of Article II “natural born Citizen” as her basis to dismiss my suit. Her testimony, recorded in the public record for all to see, is criminal fraud. I am not supposed to even be in a position to have to convince her of the definition and meaning in order to gain standing against an obviously false President, as it has been a settled matter of law for over 200 years, and it is her duty to already know the obvious definition and meaning in order to even take the judge’s oath and do her job to uphold and defend the Constitution and the rule of law. It is not her place to interject her own subjective and false religious opinion belief of the definition and meaning of this natural scientific principle in order to shield herself and Obama, and thereby unlawfully dismiss my case and deny natural born Citizens standing in court. Barker in particular is a mother, and she is supposed to be educated in the science of Jurisprudence, but yet she obviously does not comprehend the term “natural born”. She does not realize that because only females give birth to offspring and therefore only females can rely upon witness testimony at the time of birth in order to prove the parentage, that males cannot and this necessitates that male fathers have to claim and report their offspring in order to secure the natural political rights in the father’s society. Her testimony and her ignorance of the law are not believable.

For your information, the term “natural born Citizen” consists of an adjective phrase, “natural born”, modifying a proper noun title, “Citizen”. The proper noun “Citizen” means ‘Citizen of the United States’ from a State of the Union; which is a title, hence the capitalization, because titles are capitalized in the English language. In the civil law, “natural”, which is just shorthand for “natural born”, simply means the legal opposite of ‘adopted’, as in the sentence, “Are those your natural born children (natural children), or are they adopted?”

Anyone can look up the definition of ‘natural children’ in most any law dictionary and it will confirm that “natural”, i.e., “natural born” just means the legal opposite of ‘adopted’. I prefer the Bouvier Law Dictionary of 1856, 6th rev. edition, accessible online at, but just about any law dictionary should say the same thing. Therefore, it should be blindingly obvious that “natural born Citizen” simply means NOT the adopted citizen (i.e., not the ‘naturalized citizen’, which is what Obama is by scientific definition of law).

But, who are the ‘adopted’ citizens (the ‘naturalized citizens’), and who are the “natural born”? It is very simple to figure out. The adopted citizens are the offspring of non-citizen fathers, eligible for naturalization by being either born under the territorial jurisdiction of the United States (14th Amendment), i.e., in a State or federal territory or possession (jus soli), or born to a citizen mother (jus sanguinis). These are natural born SUBJECTS of federal jurisdiction, the legal opposite of a “natural born Citizen”. The non-adopted or natural members are just the offspring of citizen fathers who come from a State of the Union. It is very simple and obvious. Any layman can discover and see the truth of the matter. Thus Obama is not qualified under the Constitution and is a fake false President, by legal definition actually an Emperor-God-King, which all are forced to worship, and by his installation the Republic has been overthrown.

The offspring of U.S. citizen fathers who come from a State of the Union are not born as federal jurisdiction subjects at birth for citizenship purposes. They are simply born under the jurisdiction of the citizen father who must legitimate his offspring within 18 years of the birth in order to secure the natural right of citizenship. This is codified in 8 USC § 1409, which was examined and declared by the Supreme Court in the 2001 case Nguyen v. INS 533 U.S. 53 (2001). These are not born under federal jurisdiction as subjects, because the right to be a natural born Citizen is an inherited natural right which only comes from our U.S. citizen fathers, not a legal right that is bestowed, as verified by 8 USC § 1409 and by the Supreme Court in the Nguyen case. The reason that the definition of natural born Citizen is codified by 8 USC § 1409, the code for citizenship if only one parent is a U.S. citizen and the parents are not married, is because the act of marriage for the citizen father is a public political act which legitimizes the offspring of a citizen father before the child is even born, securing the natural right of citizenship. The offspring of U.S. citizen fathers from a State are recognized and declared to be Article II “natural born Citizens”, as long as the father is known, so that they do not have to be born under federal territory or statutory jurisdiction. Thus the place of birth and mother are both irrelevant to claim “natural born Citizen” status, as those are only avenues for alien offspring to be brought under subject status so that the naturalization process can apply to adopt the alien offspring by granting a ‘legal right’ of citizenship.

You can read more about these scientific principles of jurisprudence in my book Demonic Positivism versus the Science of “natural born Citizen”, of which I have included a free copy, so that you can have a more detailed explanation of the law governing nbC status, along with my detailed analysis of what Barker and Stinson have done.

I am writing to you about this because I would like to believe that not all the federal judges are criminally insane, willfully dishonoring their citizen fathers, and deliberately dishonoring their oaths to uphold and defend the Constitution and the rule of law. You are the Chief Judge, and I see it as your job to rein in these rogue elements and educate them. You also have a duty to report the obvious criminal political activity which has permitted the fraud Obama to strong-arm his way into the Office of President without any Constitutional authority.

Both Barker and Stinson are females who show no respect for the natural political rights of males. They are engaged in systematic denial of due process and standing against plaintiffs who sue fraud Obama. They discriminate against males based upon the sexual gender identity as males, because only males who are already citizens (not ‘subjects’) can by sex create a natural born Citizen. As a male, you should realize that this issue is one regarding the natural political rights of males to use the sex act to create another citizen, a “natural born”, i.e., non-adopted citizen, a “natural born Citizen”. Apparently Barker and Stinson think that females are hermaphrodites who impregnate themselves in a political vacuum, and the natural political rights which we male citizens pass on to our children are not included in the protections codified in the Constitution.

Again, more explanation of these scientific legal principles is in my enclosed book, which I was forced to write and publish in order to bring these serious crimes to light and to educate the mis-informed. If you want to get straight to the definition proof and meaning, see the analysis of Barker and Stinson’s criminal behavior, and learn what happened when I went to the FBI to report these crimes, then skip to Chapters 6, 7, 8, and 9.

Please be advised that copies of this letter are being sent to the FBI, Department of Justice, the Secret Service, the Department of Homeland Security, the Inspector General, to other State and federal judges, and to various news organizations. Not that any of that matters, as they have shown that they do not wish to do anything about it, as they are all brainwashed, in a conflict of interest, and refuse to do their jobs to enforce the Constitution and the rule of law in order to protect me and other natural born Citizens. Instead, they have just threatened me with arrest or murder. This is functional insanity, the inability to see the facts of reality and of scientific jurisprudence. Obviously, our society is being subjected to sustained massive coordinated criminal propaganda emanating from the news media, Congress, and the courts. This is all criminal political activity, and it is my duty and yours to report these very serious crimes which amount to High Treason and unlawful warfare against the Constitutional Republic and against natural born Citizens.

I hope that you are one who can understand this science of jurisprudence and have the honor to stand by your oath.

Paul A. Guthrie

Analysis regarding the Kentucky Kim Davis case and the issuing of ‘marriage licenses’ to Gays

Open letter to all the judges, Congressmen, attorneys, and People of the United States

FROM: Paul A. Guthrie, Legal Analyst, Political Scientist, Natural Law Scholar, Author of the book Demonic Positivism

After listening to both sides of the argument regarding Gay marriage, reading the complete travesty of false law coming out of the Supreme Court in the case Obergefell v. Hodges, and seeing a rogue out-of-control federal judge jailing a Kentucky county clerk for not obeying his lawless dictates, I have no choice but to try to enlighten all involved as to what the science of the law is, in hopes that we can return to human reason and the rule of law to govern our society.

Right now, the only thing governing our society since 2009 is lawless opinion and the threat of violence emanating from the courts. It is mob rule, not the rule of law. Decisions and actions concerning people’s rights are not being based upon the rule of law. Yours is not a civil society, and the society fostered by public Gay marriage is a violent society of false religious opinion tyranny and dictatorship. Not the rule of law.

What is meant by the ‘rule of law’?

The ‘rule of law’ is supposed to be based upon the science of Jurisprudence. Jurisprudence is only a science if it includes the Natural Law as one half of the legal system. If the Natural Law is not recognized to be in the legal system by those who are charged with administering the legal system, then their idea of law is not true law at all.

Their idea of ‘law’ is not the objective practice of a science, but only the arbitrary and false subjective religious opinions of those in positions of power dictating their opinions of a false reality with Positive Law, unrestrained by any natural rule or natural order.

This is what we are seeing with the fraudulent rulings in Obergefell v. Hodges which purports to create marriage rights for Gays, which is impossible and unconstitutional, and actually a criminal political act. It is the same problem as in the issue of Obama not being a lawful President because he is not a natural born Citizen, the offspring of a U.S. citizen father. In both of these situations, we are witnessing unrestrained decreed Positive Law in action dictating a false version of reality to the society, enforcing the acceptance of the false reality spun out by judges of the federal bench with violent criminal actions. That is what those like false judge David Bunning and the false justices of the Supreme Court are doing. These think they can play God to create reality according to their will alone, and so order a county clerk to issue a marriage license to a Gay couple, and then jail her for contempt if she refuses. No such power or right exists for judges.

Mr. David Bunning, who is not even a lawful authorized judge under Obama the false President, has no lawful authority to order Kim Davis to issue a ‘marriage license’ to Gay couples, which she is most definitely not compelled by law to do, nor to hold her in contempt for refusing to misuse the authority of Positive Law as he unlawfully ordered her to do. Mr. David Bunning has no knowledge of law, and is just practicing his own personal subjective, i.e. religious, opinion. I refuse to call him a judge because he is pushing his own private opinions, not practicing the rule of law.

Here are a couple of quotes from this imposter judge David Bunning which clearly expose and sum up the problem for the nation.

“Personal opinions, including my own, are not relevant to today,” Bunning, a federal district judge, told Davis and the courtroom Thursday. “The idea of natural law superseding this court’s authority would be a dangerous precedent indeed.”

“Her good-faith belief is simply not a viable defense. Oaths mean things.”

With his own words, false judge David Bunning indicts himself, proving that he has no lawful authority or comprehension of what he is doing, is not obeying his own oath to uphold and defend the law of the Constitution, and he is practicing a private subjective religion of law, not the scientific rule of law. His own baseless belief, that the natural law does not supersede the positive law authority of the court, is not defensible.

Let us examine this false and absurd personal ‘opinion’ that, “The idea of natural law superseding this court’s authority would be a dangerous precedent indeed.” This is the entire point of why Gay marriage is not a law, and Kim Davis does not have to issue a license, is because Natural Law is indeed the superior and controlling pre-eminent jurisdiction of the legal system which does in fact supersede the authority of the court and Congress both. This is a fact of Nature and of U.S. Jurisprudence that is beyond the comprehension of this ignorant man, who is functionally insane and has no business being a judge if he cannot accept that Nature and her rules, the Natural Law legal jurisdiction, is part of the legal system and objectively dictates what is reality and law, which both he and Kim Davis must submit to as a matter of Science. The fact that Nature supersedes governments positive law authority is a scientific fact, declared in the Declaration of Independence, and codified as the very basis of the U.S. Constitution by the natural born Citizen clause requirements for the Office of President, which federal judges do not understand or recognize either, and also is in Article III, Section 2 concerning the scope of judicial authority.

The fact that the Natural Law is the superior and controlling jurisdiction of the legal system, and not a “precedent” but a long-standing basis of the Constitution, is easily verified by reading Article III, Section 2, where the two jurisdictions of the courts are declared to be the ‘Law’ and the ‘Equity’ jurisdictions. The ‘Law’ jurisdiction is referring to Natural Law as one half of the legal system. Equity Law, Admiralty Law, and Maritime Law are all Positive Law, the legal opposite of Natural Law. The ‘Law’ jurisdiction means offenses to the Laws of Nature, as declared in the Declaration of Independence, violations of the natural order, violations of Natural Law. It is the jurisdiction of Nature which defines what is a Crime, what is Liberty, Justice, a “natural born Citizen”, and defines marriage between a man and woman. These are not defined by the decreed opinions of mankind nor by Positive Law.

The ‘precedent’ which is being established is being done by Obergefell v. Hodges and by the lawless opinions of false rogue judges like Bunning, who are creating their own ‘precedent’ of abandoning wholesale, and eliminating, one half of the legal system, by their will alone. Banishing the Natural Law half of Just law from the society and from the courts and legal system, thus eliminating the scientific and objective rule of law. They are making what is now called ‘law’ to be nothing but subjective and arbitrary false ‘opinion’, so that a ruling elite privileged class of attorneys can dictate our behavior and rights to us. That is what the false judges Kagan and Sotomayor did in Obergefell v. Hodges, and that is what Bunning is doing to Kim Davis, and to the people and State of Kentucky.

The State legislatures are not empowered to define marriage between a man and a woman. Nature is that which already defines it this way, which secures natural political rights for a father, mother, and their offspring. The State legislatures are compelled to recognize this natural order definition, and craft their codes to reflect this natural order to protect the natural law jurisdictional rights. They are not empowered with positive law to invent the right to marriage, only to declare what the right is, as observed under the Natural Law jurisdiction, and protect it by positive law enactments. They do not invent it. The rules are just discovered in Nature and its protections codified in Positive Law. The rules are not invented by mankind, but this fact of reality is beyond false judge Bunning, as clearly indicated by his absurd and outrageous ‘opinion’ that natural law does not supersede his Positive Law authority of the court. As a scientific legal matter removed from judges’ opinions, yes, it most certainly does!

The Positive Law does not define Nature, Nature defines the Positive Law. What false judge Bunning is saying, is that the legal system which he administers is now only recognized to be solely Positive Law. This is false, because the Natural Law half is mandated in Article III, Section 2. If what Mr. Bunning is saying were true, it would mean that judges and Congressmen are empowered by Positive Law to decree Nature and reality to be according to the opinions of judges and Congressmen. For example, if false judge Bunning says that White is Black, then it is so; or if he says that the Sun is cold, not hot, then the physicists are wrong, trumped by the courts’ and judges’ Positive Law decrees which will alter Nature and reality to comply with the judge’s opinions. If a judge or Congressman says that the sky is Red not Blue, then that is the ‘law’. Or if a judge or State Secretary of State says that “natural born Citizen” means the same as ‘naturalized citizen’, then that is the reality, regardless of the truth that they are legally opposite of one another. Or if a judge decrees that the Earth is the center of the solar system, not the Sun, then the Sun will move over and the Earth will be the new center, because, according to false judge Bunning, natural law is not controlling over positive law powers. In other words, false judge Bunning believes that reality is what judges dictate it to be, not what Nature dictates it to be. According to Bunning, we are not to be governed by reason, and a science of jurisprudence based upon the objective observations of the rules of Nature, even though that is mandated by Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution. Instead, reality is dictated to us by judge’s opinions according to Positive Law alone, which trumps Nature, science, and the Constitution! INSANITY!

Therefore, according to these false judges, the purpose of the positive law is not to codify protections of the natural order in order to protect Natural Law rights, but instead the purpose of Positive Law is to provide a personal venue for those in the office of judge or Congressman to dictate reality to the citizens. To provide government officials with the authority to dictate behavior to the rest of us in society who are not attorney judges or Congressmen.

Marriage is defined in Nature to be between a man and a woman as a discovered natural order, which is what ‘Law’ means in Article III Section 2. It means according to the natural order. This natural order is just discovered by mankind, not invented, nor defined by mankind. Marriage is the result of how the natural biological rules of sexual reproduction secure the natural political right inheritance of offspring, particularly the inheritance of natural membership in the political society from one’s citizen father, i.e., natural born Citizen status.

When it comes to Gays and marriage, marriage is not defined as a natural order for Gays, because Gays cannot have sex in a sexually-exclusive relationship with another of the same sex to produce offspring, such as a natural born Citizen who can be President. Thus there are no natural political rights which are of a public concern to be protected by the society with a Gay ‘marriage’. Furthermore, the society and government (Positive Law) cannot define ‘marriage’ for Gay people, because only the Gay couple can define what their contract means to them. It is not up to the society or to the government to define what is meant by ‘Gay marriage’. Also, what is meant by a ‘Gay marriage’ can vary from one Gay couple to another Gay couple, because it is strictly an artificial invented concept, not a recognized natural order. Who gets to invent this concept of Gay marriage and define it? The government, the society, and the Positive Law are not authorized or empowered to do this. The sole purpose of Positive Law is to codify recognition and protections of the Natural Law jurisdiction. If invented rights are to be created, first and foremost they must not violate the natural order, natural law rights. That is why we are supposed to have Positive Law, in order to protect the natural law rights which supersede the court’s authority. That is the first rule of Jurisprudence. Furthermore, it is physically and legally impossible, as a matter of the science of Jurisprudence, to violate the rights of Gays simply because you use the Positive Law to codify protection of the natural law rights of males and females. Thus it is obviously impossible that the State’s marriage laws, which only recognize marriage to be between a man and a woman, a natural order, can possibly incite a violation of Equal Protection towards Gays. It is impossible, thus the court’s findings in Obergefell v. Hodges are equally impossible. Obviously, what is being taught to attorneys is not scientific jurisprudence. They are teaching them a false religion of law, not the science of law.

The natural order is defined by observing the natural laws, and the court is supposed to recognize science and reality to be binding upon the courts. False judge Bunning believes that Natural Law cannot supersede the positive law powers of the court, which is the outrageous lie of monarchs and tyrants, so clearly he does not even comprehend the purpose or limitations of court authority and powers. He does not comprehend that Natural Law is opposite and opposed to Positive Law (court authority), and it is the controlling and superior pre-existing legal jurisdiction of law which does indeed supersede the courts authority, and also defines what that authority is.

Now we see the problem clearly. All of this is happening because the judges believe wrongly that they are a law unto themselves, unrestrained by Nature and reality, or by anything, including Natural Law authority, which they do not recognize even though it has been codified in the Constitution’s Article III, Section 2 as the ‘Law’ jurisdiction since 230 years ago, and judges are mandated to humble themselves to it!

When it comes to ‘Gay marriage’, their contract is a PRIVATE RIGHT, not a PUBLIC RIGHT. The Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges failed to identify just what the right is. They falsely claim a right which they do not even identify, claiming it to be contained within the 14th Amendment, which is absurd. The 14th Amendment is entirely about securing citizenship for aliens who are born in the U.S., and has nothing whatsoever to do with securing rights for Gays, who are not being denied citizenship rights.

For Gays who wish to ‘marry’, let me explain the right that they are trying to secure. They are trying to secure the right to pursue Happiness, which is a natural political right. Gay couples are not trying to secure natural political rights for offspring, such the right to create a natural born Citizen. Only a man and a woman can create a new natural citizen and secure their child’s natural political rights by act of the public marriage.

For Gays, the act of marriage is purely to satisfy their own selfish emotional needs and sexual desires. Why does the public need to know, that one male has given another male the sexually-exclusive right to put his penis up the other’s anus? What public political interest does this serve, since that form of sex cannot produce an offspring? It secures no public interest right at all, and is just gay pornography forced upon the public without their consent. Thus it is a misuse of the Positive Law authority of the courts to order it.

Thus for Gays, they want a marriage in order to secure their personal emotional happiness alone. It is not the function of the Positive Law, or within the authority of the society or State to grant this or secure this. Gays must do this for themselves with a private contract, because Gay marriage is a Private Right, not a Public Right. It is not any of the public’s business, and not a public political issue. For Gays, they can contract a private union with another person, stipulate the terms of the union, and go to the clerk of the county and file their private contract so that the public will be put on notice. But it does not require the State to sanction it, or issue a license, and no one is bound to recognize it, other than the parties bound to the contract and a judge who would adjudicate if that contract is broken. In this fashion, everyone’s rights are protected, and Gays can have a private union that they can believe is a ‘marriage’ if they want to, but no one is forced under the Positive Law against their will or conscience to recognize it. That is how Gay marriage would work in a civil society governed by the rule of law, not governed by violence.

This attempt to redefine marriage is the same religio-monarchic governance violent to natural inherited rights which the courts, judges, attorneys, Congressmen, and society at large, who refuse to recognize the Law jurisdiction of Nature, the Natural Law, or the Laws of Nature to be part of the legal system, and prior and superior to, and superseding the opinions of judges and Congressmen, have been promoting that caused Obama to be installed and maintained as a false illegitimate President. He is not legitimate and has no lawful authority to be the President because he is not a “natural born Citizen”, born as a natural member of the political base of the republic due to inheritance of natural political rights from a citizen father. But no one can see this, because no one recognizes Nature and Her rules to be a superior authority which dictates reality and what constitutes law as an objective science of jurisprudence.

As it turns out, the same rule of law which governs nbC status and proves that Obama is not a lawful or legitimate President, also defines marriage between a man and woman. It is the natural order rule of Nature, i.e., natural law, which states that, as males do not give birth to offspring, so males cannot rely upon the witness testimony of others at the time of birth of their offspring in order to prove their paternity; thus fathers must rely solely upon their own witness testimony to legitimate their offspring in order to secure the natural political rights of the offspring in the father’s society. This is why marriage is defined as a natural order between only males and females, because since males do not give birth to offspring, the marriage act is a Public Political Act which informs the society of the sexual exclusivity, that the female’s reproductive rights are spoken for, so that the future offspring born will have already been claimed and legitimated by the husband-father. This is the same rule, codified as 8 USC 1409 and declared and explained by the Supreme Court in 2001 in the case Nguyen v. INS 533 U.S. 53 (2001), which defines that a natural born Citizen is simply the legitimated offspring of a citizen father, and which defines marriage as a natural order and public political right between a man and woman in order to secure such political rights of their offspring. These two issues, the law of marriage and the law of inherited natural citizenship, are inextricably linked by the same natural law at their basis which is being systematically denied.

The American people are so out of touch with this reality, that they cannot even read “natural born Citizen” and figure out that in the civil law, the adjective phrase “natural born” just means the legal opposite of ‘adopted’, as in the sentence, “Are those your natural born children or are they adopted?” The “natural born” children are a function of Natural Law authority, i.e., sexual reproduction of the biological parents, which creates a natural right for the parents to claim their offspring as theirs. The adopted child is a function of Positive Law authority creating a ‘legal right’ to claim a child as theirs.

If you look up the term “natural children” in the Bouvier Law Dictionary, 1856, 6th rev. ed. here: then you will discover that ‘natural’, i.e., “natural born”, is simply the legal opposite of ‘adopted’. Thus “natural born Citizen” simply means, NOT the adopted citizen. The adopted citizen, called ‘naturalized’, is one who is the offspring of a non-citizen father, like Obama. The non-adopted “natural born” is simply the offspring of a citizen father who comes from a State of the Union. These are the two types of citizenship, and that is all it means.

The 14th Amendment does not even apply to the offspring of citizen fathers, unless the father is unknown. The “natural born” Citizen of Article II is describing an inherited natural right of citizenship. This is most definitely not the bestowed legal right which is granted to natural born SUBJECTS, i.e., to those offspring of non-citizen fathers who are born in the U.S. (jus soli) or born to a citizen mother (jus sanguinis). The right to be a “natural born” Citizen is only inherited from a citizen father, offspring who are not born as ‘subjects’ of the federal government for citizenship purposes.

The place of birth (14th Amendment, Positive Law only) was only supposed to apply to foreign alien offspring of non-U.S. citizen fathers, to adopt them and grant them legal citizenship at birth as automatically naturalized citizens; this is the legal opposite of a “natural born Citizen”. Persons not inheriting natural political membership from a U.S. citizen father are not supposed to be able to be President. This can be verified in the seminal 1856 Bouvier Law Dictionary of American Constitutional Law, link given above, under the term “naturalized citizen”, which states that naturalized citizens, like Obama, have all of the same rights as the natural born citizen, EXCEPT the right to be President or Vice President. This is by natural definition, as no one can be a chief representative of the natural political base of which he is not a member.

It is axiomatic that the offspring of a non-citizen father is born as a political alien with respect to the offspring of a citizen father who comes from a State of the Union, thus they must be adopted and naturalized. This is legislated to be automatic at birth if the offspring is born to a citizen mother, or born under the territorial jurisdiction of Congress, i.e., born here under the 14th Amendment. These only qualify as naturalized citizens, not as ‘natural born’ Citizens.

It is obvious that unless your father is a free ‘citizen’, only then can he use his sperm to create another natural born citizen. But if your father is not a ‘citizen’, only a ‘subject’ of the state, or of a monarchy form of government, or a refugee stateless person, or a slave, then this father can only use his sperm to create a natural born SUBJECT or slave, and he cannot use his sperm to create a natural born ‘citizen’. It is obvious and simple to comprehend, but everyone calls Obama ‘President’ which is a lie of Biblical proportions and a subjective religious opinion which violates the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, not a scientific fact of Nature. This is happening because judges and Congressman believe that their positive law decrees trump the natural law and trump the Constitution, which is a lie. Everyone is functionally insane. This is what happens when you abandon the Natural Law, i.e., abandon reason and the rules of Nature and reality so that they removed from being the basis of your legal system.

You can read more about this legal science in my book, Demonic Positivism versus the Science of “natural born Citizen” available here:, and at the book website:

Here is the analysis of the problems that fake judges like Bunning are having with the Christian attorneys and those Christians like Kim Davis refusing to issue marriage licenses to Gay couples, and the mistakes that the plaintiffs are making:

First, the fake judges erroneously believe, due to their ignorance of the science of law called Jurisprudence, that Natural Law is not part of their legal system, which is false because it is the prior superior half of the legal system as codified in Article III, Section 2 as the ‘Law’ jurisdiction. The entire purpose of the Positive Law (Equity Law) was to codify protections of the discovered natural order and natural rights which only come from the Natural Law jurisdiction; not violate them as public ‘Gay marriage’ laws do.

Second, the attorneys for the Christian resisters do not comprehend the Natural Law legal jurisdiction, believing falsely that their case depends upon a belief in God, which is an opinion, not a scientific fact. So they attempt to argue that their client’s rights are being violated as a violation of a religious belief in the Bible or in God, when none of that is even the point, is irrelevant, and all unnecessary. They fail to inform the court that the natural rights involved only depend upon the objective awareness and acceptance of Nature to exist and be the provider of natural rights, as are authorized and mandated to be recognized and protected in the Constitution by the Article III, Section 2 inclusion of the ‘Law’ jurisdiction in the authorization of the federal courts.

The mistake being made by the Christian attorneys is they are making their client’s case about a belief in the Bible and in God, which carries no weight with the court because those are only subjective opinions, not scientific facts. That is clearly what fake justice Bunning is seeing that made him say things like “Her good-faith belief is simply not a viable defense. Oaths mean things.” What the judge is seeing, because this is the case being made by Kim Davis and her attorneys, is that it is Ms. Davis’ belief in the Bible and God which is causing her to refuse to issue the license to Gays, and that is not a viable basis to deny the license. And the judge is correct. The correct viable basis is to focus only on the objective scientific provable facts which state that the Natural Law of Nature provides a natural order and natural rights, and that the purpose of the Positive Law is to protect the natural law rights, not issue licenses which are contrary to the natural order. There is not any valid statutory provision created by State law or Federal Law for Gays to have a ‘marriage license’. The court is ordering Ms. Davis to follow a law which does not exist. The court is ordering her to follow the religious opinions of the court, which she is not duty-bound to obey.

But Ms. Davis is countering this with merely her own religious opinions, because it is only a religious opinion that Nature and the Laws of Nature, the natural order and natural law, and natural rights come from a ‘God’. How Nature and the Natural Law came to be here governing our legal system is an unknowable philosophical question, is not the issue, and cannot be a valid basis to defend Ms. Davis’ actions. The entire issue is that Nature exists, that it is real and follows a natural order, which is her job to protect with the Positive Law of the State, and that the federal court is bound to protect the natural order by the inclusion of the ‘Law’ jurisdiction in Article III, Section 2, under which the federal court is authorized as subservient to the natural law, to be governed by the natural order of things, not by religious opinions of judges or plaintiffs. This point is not being made regarding Obama and the meaning of natural born Citizen, and is also not being made regarding Gay marriage. Now we are at a point where the Natural Law legal jurisdiction has been abandoned by both sides in favor of dueling personal subjective religious opinions, and the rule of law has been turned into the rule of whoever wins this battle of opinions.

Of course, the religious opinions in the federal courts will continue to trump the religious opinions of Christians like Kim Davis, and the scientific natural rights of natural born Citizens. It is a sad day for our nation to be living once again under religious monarchic tyranny emanating from all sides. The big loser is science and the rule of law. This is life under King George III all over again.

I hope that this exposition will open the minds of some to the science of jurisprudence, and help re-establish the rule of law. I can provide more elaboration of the basis of law, please contact me for any further assistance.

Paul Guthrie

Announcing the Book


Hello fellow patriots,

By now, those on my mailing list will have gotten a news release about my book, which many of you had expressed interest in getting once it became published. The title is Demonic Positivism versus The Science of “natural born Citizen”.  It’s now available at the CreateSpace e-Store, and will soon be posted on in the U.S. and in the U.K.

I know you’ve wondered about what happened to me after I went to England seeking political asylum in order to contact other governments to notify them of the illegitimacy of the American government, and see if any of them would accept and act upon the real facts. Well, I suffered a lot to try to bring the truth to light there, and after I was returned to the U.S., I was quite depressed and had to take some time to convalesce from the mental torture I had endured, and so I was unable to update you. It’s quite a long story, and despite how hard it was for me to relive it, I tell about it in my book.

So, after I was somewhat recovered, I decided that the only thing I could do further would be to publish this book that would explain the whole nature of the situation, from the ground up, providing the remedial civics education and science of law, in the context of the entire span of human history, showing that this is the same old problem of how enslaving empire is always seeking to overcome free republics. This book is about the political science of the law that proves that it’s not an opinion that Obama is a monarch, it is a fact by the hard science of law and reality. I show that what had been a hard science of jurisprudence has been skewed and reinterpreted for the purposes of empire, by removing the standard of justice in the Natural Law, the basis of the American Constitution that created a representative self-governing Republic in America.

But I’ve made this science of law easily accessible to the average reader, because the Constitution was meant to be understood in terms of common sense, the sense that rational people have for whether they are enslaved or free to have self-determination. I simply provide the facts to support the feeling that most everyone has that something is terribly wrong with the U.S. government. I’ve shown that the facts about “natural born Citizen” are as easy to understand as the simple question, “Are those your natural born children or are they adopted?” And I provide a plan to really make a difference with this book as a concise education for those who are ignorant of the scientific facts that define the law, who might wake up if they just got the real facts to disperse the false hype. Now is the time that you can really make a difference, I’ve given you the tool.

This book also gives a lot more, it shows the development of the philosophy of freedom throughout the ages. It outlines the ‘real history’ that gives perspective on our modern catastrophe, from ancient times, in fact, the times of Jesus under the Roman Empire, through to the Middle Ages, the Age of Kings and the power of the Roman Church, and then the Age of Reason and Enlightenment that sought to free mankind from the dominion of those monarchs, which produced the American Republic and the U.S. Constitution based upon the principles of the Natural Law of Nature and Nature’s God, as stated in the Declaration of Independence. And then up to the 20th Century problems with Nazism, and onward to the past few decades that we’ve lived through with the increasing monarchism under the Bush family dynasty, and now in the present with the complete overthrow of the Constitution under the legally-defined King Obama.

All of those Ages were critical junctures of mankind’s choice to be free or to rise up to overcome enslavement. Another one of those critical times is upon us now. This book can provide you with the tools of empowerment for effective action, you have only to read it to understand what to do.

Buy the book at the book website Demonic Positivism